Submitted papers should be written in good English. Avoiding Surcharges from Extensive English Editing on Submitted Articles Japan residents will have the Japanese Consumption Tax (JCT) added to their invoices at the rate set by the Japanese government. There is no place for discrimination on the basis of any one of these characteristics.Īuthors from Switzerland will have the local Value Added Tax (VAT) added to their invoices. More needs to be done to bridge the gap between the global North and South-and to create equal opportunities for people without regard to race, color, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, religion, country of origin, physical ability, or socio-economic status. We understand that diversity does not end there. The daily exchange of ideas between the East and the West has been at the heart of MDPI's progress from day one. Only by valuing differences can we create an equitable and inclusive work environment and foster the openness that is key to our mission. To deepen our understanding of the research communities that we serve, we aim to build journals that are just as diverse and inclusive. We are serving scholars from across the globe and from a variety of backgrounds. Our journals are indexed in the leading databases and, since they are open access, have a broad readership.Īs a pioneer open access publisher, our mission is to make new research findings accessible to everyone. MDPI journals are the perfect place for you to publish your work under an open access license, in a fast and straightforward manner.
All journals uphold a peer-reviewed, rapid, and rigorous manuscript handling and editorial process. Allow at least one week for the editor, editorial staff to check the last minor correction, or possibly a little more, for instance if the editor decides to ask a picky reviewer to do the job.MDPI is a publisher of scholarly open access journals. I suggest you to comply to the minor edits as soon as possible. My opinion: chances are your paper is going to be accepted.īut you never know for sure before you get the final acceptance letter (or the publication, which could be withdrawn for outer reasons). After three rounds of major revisions (which is huge), I suppose the journal has bet on you paper (or has surrended).
Imagine you drastically change your manuscript at this stage, not taking into account the suggested minor revisions? The editor would have the right (and power) to withdraw your submission, which would be fair. The answer depends on the associate editor, and mostly on you. In my field (biology) I wouldn't be surprised to hear back about acceptance anywhere from 1 day to 1 month after re-submission. Editors may prefer not to explicitly say that the paper is "accepted with minor revisions", because authors may make "minor revisions" that don't correct the problems, and then feel that they've been promised publication in spite of that.ĭepending on the journal, the editor, and the revisions, the manuscript may or may not go out to re-review once again, and even if it doesn't a one-week delay from submission to re-evaluation is not surprising. Yes, characterizing revisions as "minor" strongly suggests that if you make those revisions the paper will be accepted.
However, if the author fails to address the concerns when revising the paper, the Editor may send the paper to another round of minor revision, and in extreme cases, to the major revision (for example if the minor corrections start to reveal bigger problems with the papers as originally envisioned). Minor revision usually implies that the reviewers (and the editor) think that authors can correct the paper in a way that will address all of the concerns, and the reviewers not need to see the paper again before publication.įrom the reviewer's standpoint, "minor revision" means "authors should fix this and this, and don't bother me with the review again, the manuscript is ok otherwise".
0 kommentar(er)
